← Library
Madras High CourtWP/33208/2025dismissed

L.Jagadeesh v. The Secretary

2025-09-03Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr.Justice G.Arul Murugan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.09.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN L.Jagadeesh .. Petitioner -vs1. The Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Chairman, National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), 12/11, Jamnagar House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi 110 011.

3. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority (TNSLSA), High Court Campus, North Fort Road, Chennai 600 104.

4. The Chairman, District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), Chennai ADR Building, Madras High Court Campus, Chennai 600 104.

5. The Additional Commissioner of Police, Tamil Nadu Traffic Police Head Quarters, E.V.K.Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

.. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose petitioner's representation dated 22.07.2025 to consider and direct the respondents to formulate and implement a structure and recurring mechanism for the disposal of pending and compoundable traffic violation cases, including on-spot challans as based on successful models followed in other states, such as Delhi, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh for all types of vehicles through Lok Adalat's in the State of Tamil Nadu, with coordination between the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority (TNSLSA), District Legal Services Authority (DLSAs) and Tamil Nadu Traffic Police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.S.N.Subramani For Respondents :

Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Govt. Advocate for R-1 :

Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Addl. Public Prosecutor for R-5 * * * * *

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The petition seeks a direction to the respondents to formulate a scheme for disposal of the pending and compoundable traffic violation cases.

2. These aspects are all matters of judicial administration and no direction can be issued as sought by the petitioner. Petition is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 03.09.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No sra

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN , J.

(sra) To

1. The Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Chairman, National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), 12/11, Jamnagar House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi 110 011.

3. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority (TNSLSA), High Court Campus, North Fort Road, Chennai 600 104.

4. The Chairman, District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), Chennai ADR Building, Madras High Court Campus, Chennai 600 104.

5. The Additional Commissioner of Police, Tamil Nadu Traffic Police Head Quarters, E.V.K.Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

03.09.2025