Ilayakumar v. State Through

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.09.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Ilayakumar

...Petitioner/Accused

Vs.

State through Sub Inspector of Police, Vandavasi North Police Station

...Respondent/Complainant

Saranya ... Respondent/Defacto complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No. 138 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.

*** For Petitioner : Mr. S.Durai Murugan For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinothkumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested on 28.08.2024 and remanded to judicial custody on the same day for the offences under Sections 329(4), 75(1)(i), 75(1)(ii), 75(2), 351(3) of BNS 2023 and Section 92(b) of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016, in Crime No. 138 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is partially blind lady and this petitioner had misbehaved with the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he is a law-abiding citizen and he is ready to furnish substantial sureties for his due release on bail; therefore, he prays for the grant of bail to the petitioner.

2/6

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) objected for granting bail to the petitioner stating that the defacto complainant is partially blind lady and this petitioner had misbehaved with the defacto complainant and there is no previous case against the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the submissions made on both sides and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner and also the petitioner has no previous case and also the relationship between the parties, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

[a]. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the court of Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai District-08 and on further conditions that:

3/6

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;

[c] The petitioner shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond;

[d] The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected;

[e] The petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[f] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with evidence; 4/6

[g] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and [h] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of the BNS.

24.09.2024 vsg To

1. Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai District-08 2.Sub Inspector of Police, Vandavasi North Police Station 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

P.DHANABAL, J.

vsg 24.09.2024 6/6