← Library
Madras High CourtWA/3433/2024disposed of

S.Ganapathy v. The Inspector General Of Registration

2025-09-18Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Shaffiq6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

1. S.Ganapathy Vice President, Vengal Village Panchayat, No.894, Ottarpalayam Street, Vengal-601103, Thiruvallur District.

Appellant(s) Vs

1. The Inspector General Of Registration O/o.Inspector General of Registration, No.120, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Chennai-600028.

2.The District Collector Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur-602001.

3.The District Registrar, O/o.District Registrar, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur-602001.

4.The Sub Registrar Office of the Sub Registrar, Arani, Thiruvallur District.

5.N.D.R.Warehousing Pvt. Ltd.

Rep. by its Managing Director, No.54, "B" Block, 103, Sreekaram Apartment, Pallavan Nagar, Maduravoyal, Chennai-600095 Respondent(s) PRAYER:- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, seeking to set aside the order dated 18.06.2024 made in WP No.25801 of 2023 and allow the Writ Appeal with costs against the respondents. For Appellant(s):

Mr.S.Thirumavalavan For Respondent(s):

Mr.U.Baranidharan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4 R5-No Appearance

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present intra-court appeal has been instituted to assail the writ order dated 18.06.2024 in W.P.No.25801 of 2023.

2. The writ petitioner is the appellant. The relief sought for in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the th respondent namely, N.D.R. Warehousing Private Limited has presented two documents for registration, which are undervalued. Since the Sub-Registrar failed to initiate any action, the appellant sent representation. The respondent has not taken any action on the appellant's representation, the writ petition came to be instituted.

4. The learned Special Government Pleader would submit that the Authorities, on scrutiny, found that the actual value adopted by the Presentant of the documents were not in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act.

5. However, regarding the allegation raised by the appellant, it was found that the super structure has been undervalued. Consequently, the Panel report was called for and actions are initiated under Section 47-A(3) of the Indian Stamp Act. Therefore, the grievance of the appellant has been addressed.

6. It is needless to state that the action initiated under Section 47-A(3) of the Indian Stamp Act is to be continued and all further appropriate actions are to be initiated in the manner known to law and to be completed as expeditiously as possible

7. With the above observations, this Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs. (S.M.S., J.) (M.S.Q., J.) 18-09-2025 kkn Index:No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

To 1.The Inspector General Of Registration O/o.Inspector General of Registration, No.120, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Chennai-600028 2.The District Collector Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur-602001 3.The District Registrar O/o.District Registrar, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur-602001 4.The Sub Registrar Office of the Sub Registrar, Arani, Thiruvallur District 5.N.D.R.Warehousing Pvt. Ltd.

Rep. by its Managing Director, No.54, "B" Block, 103, Sreekaram Apartment, Pallavan Nagar, Maduravoyal, Chennai-600095

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.

AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J.

KKN 18-09-2025