Madras High CourtWP/4833/2016disposed of

A.Flora Daisy Rani v. The Chairman

2016-02-09Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.02.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.4833 of 2016 A.Flora Daisy Rani ..Petitioner -Vs1.The Chairman Teachers Recruitment Board College Road, Chennai-6 2.The Director of School Education College Road, Chennai-6 3.The Member Secretary Teachers Recruitment Board College Road, Chennai-6 ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the claim of the petitioner for continuance as Graduate Teacher(Tamil) and for extension of all consequential service benefits thereto on the basis of the representation dated 15.07.2015 seeking issuance of No Objection Certificate.

For petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar For respondents : Mr.R.Vijaya Kumar, Addl.Govt.Pleader

O R D E R

Ms.A.Flora Daisy Rani, the petitioner, has filed this writ petition, seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider her claim for continuance as Graduate Teacher(Tamil) and for extension of all consequential service benefits thereto on the basis of the representation dated 15.07.2015.

2. The petitioner was appointed as Graduate Assistant (Tamil) on 08.01.2013 in Thali (jyp) Government Panchayat Union School. After 4 days, she was informed by the Headmaster of the School to contact the Chief Educational Officer and to produce No Objection Certificate with regard to qualification of 10 + 2 + 3 scheme, even though she had passed the Teachers Eligibility Test. According to the petitioner, the first respondent has not https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

so far issued the said No Objection Certificate. Hence, the petitioner had sent a representation dated 15.07.2015 to the respondents, however, the said representation is not disposed of till date. Hence, the present writ petition.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of her repeated oral explanation that she finished the course in 10 + 2 + 3 pattern, she was not allowed to continue as Graduate Assistant (Tamil).

4. Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader submits that six weeks time may be granted to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 15.07.2015.

5. Considering the above submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.07.2015 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

-s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar nvsri To 1.The Chairman Teachers Recruitment Board College Road, Chennai-6 2.The Director of School Education College Road, Chennai-6 3.The Member Secretary Teachers Recruitment Board College Road, Chennai-6 +1 cc to Mr.L.Chandra kumar Advocate sr.8324/16 +1 cc to Government Pleader sr.8524/16 W.P.No.4833 of 2016 aa10/03/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/