Mani v. State Rep By

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 448, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.335 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to a gambling dispute, the petitioners have trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant, abused him in filthy language, assaulted him with iron pipe and also intimidated his wife. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and due to previous enmity, a false complaint has been given against them. He would further submit that the injury sustained by the defacto complainant is simple in nature. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent would submit that due to a gambling dispute, the petitioners

have trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant, abused him in filthy language, assaulted him with iron pipe and also intimidated his wife. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no case pending as against them Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vanur, on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

further condition that:

[a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC;

10.11.2022 vkr

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

vkr 10.11.2022