A.Saravanan v. The State Rep By Its

Crl.O.P.No.27649 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.27649 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J., The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 341 and 307 IPC in Crime No.275 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that due to enmity on account of girl eloping, the petitioners have waylaid the defacto complainant and his uncle and abused them and also assaulted indiscriminately with iron rod and wooden log. Due to which, the defacto complainant's uncle sustained grievous injuries. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would submit that the injured have been discharged from the hospital and thereby, the arrested accused had been released on bail. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that it is a case, where the petitioner along with other accused on account of previous enmity, had attacked the victims https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

Crl.O.P.No.27649 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.J, Anu indiscriminately with iron road and wooden log, due to which, the victims sustained grievous injuries and one of the victims has sustained fracture in his leg and that he was treated as in-patient more than a month. He would further submit that this is the third anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions and the grievous nature of injury, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 16.11.2022 Anu Crl.O.P.No.27649 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2