← Library
Madras High CourtCRL RC/1579/2025dismissed

Mekala v. The State By Sub Inspector Of Police

2025-08-28Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.R.C.No.1579 of 2025 and Crl.MP.Nos.16312 & 16314 of 2025 1.Mekala 2.Kavin .....

Petitioners Vs 1.The State by Sub Inspector of Police, Bhavani Police Station, Bhavani Cr.No.17/2022 2.Thavasiyappan 3.Veerasamy 4.Mani .....

Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 442 of BNSS, praying to call for the records of CC.No.186 of 2022 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Bhavani and set aside the impugned order dated 13.08.2024 in CMP.No.2744 of 2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Bhavani in CC.No.186 of 2022, whereby the petitioners have been summoned as accused Nos.4 & 6 under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. For Petitioners : Mr.B.Gopalakrishnan for Mr.D.Krishnamoorthy For Respondents For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate(crl.side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 13.08.2024 passed in CMP.No.2744 of 2024 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Bhavani in CC.No.186 of 2022, thereby allowing the petition filed under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. by the first respondent. 2.

Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the first respondent and perused, all the materials placed before this Court. 3.

It is seen that originally there were three accused in CC.No.186 of 2022. After examination of prosecution witnesses, the first respondent filed petition to implead accused 4 to 8 since there are specific allegations against them. On perusal of records, it is revealed that PW1 to 3 categorically deposed about the specific overt act of accused 4 to 8. Hence, the trial court rightly allowed the petition and this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the impugned order.

4.

In view of the above discussion, this criminal revision case is dismissed. However, the trial court is directed to complete the trial within the period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Further, the personal appearance of the petitioners is dispensed with and they shall be

represented by a counsel after filing appropriate application. The petitioners shall be present before the Court below at the time of furnishing of copies, framing charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., and at the time of passing judgment. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 28.08.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

lok To 1.The learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Bhavani 2.Sub Inspector of Police, Bhavani Police Station, Bhavani 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 28.08.2025