N.Sarojini v. The State Rep By Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.08.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR in Crl.A.No.1264 of 2025 1.N.Sarojini 2.P.Saravanan @ Saravanadhasu ... Petitioners/A1 & A2 Vs.
State represented by The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Coimbatore.
... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430(1) of BNSS, 2023 to suspend the sentence and enlarge the petitioners on bail in the Special Calendar Case No.25 of 2013 on the file of the Special Judge, Special Court for the trial of Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Coimbatore pending disposal of the above Criminal Appeal. For petitioners : Mr.V.N.Krishnamurthy For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor 1/8
ORDER
The petitioners/A1 & A2 in Spl.C.C.No.25 of 2013 were convicted st petitioner was by the trial Court by the judgment dated 31.07.2025. The 1 convicted for the offences under Sections 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment, for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment, for the offence under Sections 13(2) r/w nd petitioner was 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The 2 convicted for the offences under Sections 12, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 109 of I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo eight months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment, for the 2/8
offence under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment, for the offence under Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act r/w Section 109 of I.P.C. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioners had preferred the above appeal along with the instant miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence and bail.
st petitioner is the Bill 2.The case against the petitioners is that the 1 nd petitioner is her husband. The de-facto complainant Collector and the 2 constructed an additional portion in front of his house, for which, he st petitioner/A1 for assessing house tax for presented an application before 1 st petitioner initially demanded Rs.10,000/- the additional construction. The 1 as illegal gratification for assessing house tax for the additional construction. Later it was reduced to Rs.8,000/-. The de-facto complainant not willing to give bribe amount and lodged a complaint against the petitioners. 3/8
3.The contention of the learned counsel for petitioners is that the st petitioner had assessed the house tax and sent the file to the Assistant Commissioner on 02.01.2013 itself and the alleged demand was on 07.01.2013. There is no need to collect any bribe when the work itself has been completed. He further submitted that the petitioners have raised substantial grounds in the appeal and the sentence imposed on the petitioners have already been suspended by the trial Court till 29.08.2025. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the The de-facto complainant constructed an additional portion in front of his st petitioner/A1 for house, for which, he presented an application before 1 st petitioner initially assessing house tax for the additional construction. The 1 demanded Rs.10,000/- as illegal gratification for assessing house tax for the st petitioner demanded Rs.8,000/- by additional construction. Thereafter, the 1 stating that she would assess the house tax @ Rs.10/- per sq.ft instead of 4/8
Rs.20/- per sq.ft. He further submitted that during trial, on the side of the prosecution, PW1 to PW8 examined, Exs.P1 to P11 marked and M.O.1 to M.O.5 produced. On the side of the defence, none examined and Exs.D1 and D2 marked. The trial Court on the evidence and materials produced, had rightly convicted the petitioner. He fairly submitted that the jail sentence imposed on the petitioners has been suspended by the trial Court till 29.08.2025.
4.Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the st petitioner is the Bill Collector and 2 nd materials, it is seen that the 1 st petitioner petitioner is her husband. According to the petitioners, the 1 completed the assessment of the newly construction portion in front of the de-facto complainant's house on 02.01.2013 and the alleged trap was on 07.01.2013. There is no reason to collect any bribe when the work itself was completed. The completion of work is admitted by the Assistant 5/8
Commissioner. These facts have not been considered by the trial Court. Further, the trial Court had already suspended the sentence of the petitioners till 29.08.2025. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of suspension of sentence to the petitioners.
5.Accordingly, the substantive sentence of Imprisonment imposed on the petitioners is suspended till the disposal of the appeal and they are ordered to be enlarged on bail, on condition that they shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each, with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 6.Further, the petitioners shall appear before the Trial Court once in three months at 10.30 a.m. on the first working day of the month, until the disposal of the appeal and if they are not able to appear before the Trial Court on that day, they shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the Trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of their absence as directed by the Trial Court. 6/8
7.Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 18.08.2025 (2/2) rsi To 1.The Special Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Coimbatore.
2.The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Coimbatore.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
7/8
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
rsi in Crl.A.No.1264 of 2025 18.08.2025 (2/2) 8/8