Durairaj v. Sandanamarie Laberthanitho

C.M.P.No.21635 of 2017 in S.A.No.(SR).82814 of 2017 P.T. ASHA, J, It is seen that notice has been served on the 2nd respondent as well as the 3rd respondent. The 1st respondent had died even pending suit and his legal representatives are brought on record as respondents 2 to 7, who remaining ex parte through the proceedings. The service is deemed to be sufficient. The service need not be taken on the respondents 2 to 7.

2.This petition is filed for condoning the delay of 196 days in filing the above appeal.

The petitioner has given sufficient reasons for condoning the delay. Therefore, the delay is condoned and this petition is allowed.

14.12.2018 mps http://www.judis.nic.in