← Library
Madras High CourtWP/29463/2019disposed of

J.V.Madhan Raj v. Chief Educational Officer,

2019-10-15Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.10.2019

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.29463 of 2019 J.V.Madhan Raj

...Petitioner

vs.

1.The Chief Educational Officer, Cuddalore.

2.The District Educational Officer, Virudhachalam.

3.The Block Educational Officer, Nallur.

4.Danish Mission Elementary School, rep. by its Central Manager, A.L.C. Campus, Bharathi Road, Cuddalore.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the application of the petitioner forwarded by the 4th respondent for regularisation /approval of the service of the petitioner as Secondary Grade Assistant Teacher in Danish Mission Elementary School, PE Ponneri.

For Petitioner :Mr.K.J.Parthasarathy For Respondents :Mr.C.Munusamy Special Government Pleader

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to direct the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the application of the petitioner forwarded by the fourth respondent for regularisation /approval of the service of the petitioner as Secondary Grade Assistant Teacher in Danish Mission Elementary School, PE Ponneri.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed as a Secondary Grade Assistant Teacher in D.M.Elementary School in the year 2016 on compassionate grounds. On 16.08.2018, the fourth respondent/D.M.Elementary School had forwarded the application for approval of the appointment of the petitioner to the second respondent and thereafter, the second respondent had returned the said application by raising certain queries on 04.11.2018. The fourth respondent complied the queries raised by the second respondent and resubmitted the application on 25.01.2019. However, the second respondent did not take any action. Thereafter, the petitioner made a representation to the respondents on 23.09.2019, requesting to consider the application for approval and pass appropriate orders. Till date, the representation was not considered.

Hence, the petitioner filed a Writ Petition before this Court. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice if this Court issues direction to the second respondent to consider the application forwarded by the fourth respondent and to dispose of the same within a reasonable time as fixed by this Court.

4.Without going into the merits of the case, I am inclined to issue direction to direct the second respondent to consider the application forwarded by the fourth respondent and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(J) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar pam To 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Cuddalore.

2.The District Educational Officer, Virudhachalam.

3.The Block Educational Officer, Nallur.

+1 CC to Mr.K.J.Parthasarathy, Advocate sr 86136. +1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 86489.

W.P.No.29463 of 2019 VD(CO) SP(18/10/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/