Madras High CourtWP/7982/2016disposed of

J.Abdul Kadar, v. The Transport Commissioner,

2016-03-03Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.03.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.Nos. 7982 to 7996 of 2016 J.Abdul Kadar ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7982 of 2016 S.Revathi ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7983 of 2016 M.Nagalakshmi ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7984 of 2016 S.Kaleel Mohamed ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7985 of 2016 D.Mahalakshmi ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7986 of 2016 N.Kuppusamy ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7987 of 2016 L.Rajeswari ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7988 of 2016 C.Dhanasekar ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7989 of 2016 A.Ravi ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7990 of 2016 A.Murugan ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7991 of 2016 R.Sherin Farhana ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7992 of 2016 R.Ganesan ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7993 of 2016 A.Vijayakumar ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7994 of 2016 E.Kala ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7995 of 2016 B.Venkatesan ..

Petitioner in WP.No.7996 of 2016 v.

1 The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority Chepauk Chennai- 600 005.

2 The Regional Transport Officer Chennai (North East) Chennai .. Respondents in all Wps.

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to receive the application of the petitioner dated 26.12.2015 in form CCPA with the prescribed fee for the grant of a Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Govindaraman For Respondents : Mr.A.Rajaperumal Govt. Advocate COMMON ORDER The petitioners have filed the above writ petitions to issue a writs of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent concerned to receive the respective applications of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petitioners dated 26.12.2015 in form CCPA with the prescribed fee for the grant of a Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

2. Mr.A.Rajaperumal, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents and submitted that the second respondent concerned may be directed to consider the petitioners' application in accordance with law.

3. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioners, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the second respondent concerned to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 26.12.2015 and consider the same and pass appropriate orders on the respective applications of the petitioners for grant of Autorickshaw permit, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With this observation, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

Rj -s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1 The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority Chepauk Chennai- 600 005.

2 The Regional Transport Officer Chennai (North East) Chennai + 15 ccs to M/s.S.Govindaraman,Advocate, SR 13793 + 1 cc to Government Pleader, High Court, Madras SR 14296 sai(co) prk8/3 W.P.Nos.7982 to 7996 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/