M/S Saravana And Co Rep By Its Proprietrix Mrs H S Kalpana v. The State Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 22.08.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY & W.M.P.Nos.35037 & 35039 of 2025 M/s Saravana and Co Rep by its Proprietrix Mrs H S Kalpana SF No. 18/5 Near Anna silai,Somerpettai, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District - 635001 ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State Tax Officer Krishnagiri 1 Cricle, Krishnagiri

2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) GST Appeals,Combined Commercial Tax Buildings, Hasthampatti,Salem - 636007 ... Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the connected records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the 1st Respondent herein made in GSTIN-33ACGPK9135J1ZH/2020-21 dated 21/02/2025 and 20/05/2025 and quash the same 1/6

For Petitioner : Ms.P.Velammal For Respondent : Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, GA

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned assessment order dated 21.02.2025 & the rectification rejection order dated 20.05.2025.

2. When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is willing to file an appeal against the said impugned assessment order. Therefore, though he had sought for larger relief in this petition, he had restricted his relief to the extent to request this Court to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal.

3. Further, he would submit that the petitioner is willing to pay 15% of the disputed tax amount, i.e., 10% towards statutory pre-deposit 2/6

for filing the appeal along with additional pre-deposit of 5% to the respondent. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

4. In reply, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent requests this Court to pass any appropriate orders with regard to the filing of appeal.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record.

6. In the case on hand, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that now the petitioner is willing to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order dated 21.02.2025 passed by the respondent and he has restricted his relief and requested this Court to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order since it will be sufficient to meet out the case of the petitioner.

3/6

7. Further, it was submitted that the petitioner is willing to pay 15% of the disputed tax amount to the respondent. Therefore, though this petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 21.02.2025, considering the submissions made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order.

8. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

9. While dismissing this petition, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the concerned Appellate Authority, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, subject to the payment of 15% of the disputed tax amount to the respondent as agreed by the petitioner (10% of disputed tax amount towards statutory pre-deposit for filing the appeal along with additional 5% of disputed tax amount). In such case, the Appellate Authority shall 4/6

consider the said appeal filed by the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law, by providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, without pressing for limitation.

22.08.2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No nsa To

1. The State Tax Officer Krishnagiri 1 Cricle, Krishnagiri

2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) GST Appeals,Combined Commercial Tax Buildings, Hasthampatti,Salem - 636007 5/6

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., nsa & W.M.P.Nos.35037 & 35039 of 2025 22.08.2025 6/6