K. Prakasam v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 31.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.34276 of 2004 K.Prakasam .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commissioner, Employment and Training Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

2. The District Collector, Salem District, Salem-636 001.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, (Land Acquisition Officer), Salem Taluk, Salem-636 001.

4. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Commissioner, Land Administration Department, Chennai.

(The fourth respondent impleaded as per the order of Court, dated 09.03.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.46692 of 2004) .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to discharge the liability as per the order of the High Court in A.S.No.1114 of 1986, dated 27.04.2000 within a reasonable time.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Jagadeesan For Respondent : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, Govt. Advocate

ORDER

When the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is no more. It is further stated that he has taken best efforts to get the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

impleaded, but the lower Court counsel who has entrusted the matter to the learned counsel, has not collected the details to inform him. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar cs To

1. The Commissioner, Employment and Training Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

2. The District Collector, Salem District, Salem-636 001.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, (Land Acquisition Officer), Salem Taluk, Salem-636 001.

4. The Commissioner, Land Administration Department, Chennai.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.55271 W.P.No.34276 of 2004 MN(CO) GN(24/08/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/