K. Akbar Ali v. The T.N. Wakf Board Rep By Its

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.27073 of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006 K.Akbar Ali ... Petitioner versus 1.The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep.by its Chief Executive Officer, No.7 (Old No.4), 9th Cross, Indira Nagar, Chennai - 600 020.

2.S.A.Abdul Basith 3.A.B.Abdul Ahath 4.Haji B.S.Sirajudeen 5.S.S.Ibunu Savood 6.T.M.Abdul Gaffar 7.M.A.Habidulla 8.M.A.Jagarulla 9.D.M.Mohamed Sirajudeen 10.S.B.Sultan Sherfudeen 11.S.A.Sheikh Mohideen 12.A.G.Habibur Rehman

...Respondents

(R2 to R12 are impleaded as per order dated 28.2.2007 in MP.No.2 of 2006 in W.P.No.27073 of 2006) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus,directing the respondent herein to finalise and frame the scheme for the Salem Mohamedpura Madarasa-e-Kareemiya in order to hold election as per the provisions of the scheme that would be framed by the respondent herein.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents: Mr.V.Lakshminarayanan for R1 Mr.Mukunth for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates for R2 to R12 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

On 27.04.2018, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on 06.06.2018.

2.Today, even though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ms To 1.The Chief Executive Officer, The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.7 (Old No.4), 9th Cross, Indira Nagar, Chennai - 600 020.

+1cc to M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates, Advocate sr.no.35042 W.P.No.27073 of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006 bs(co) nr 19/06/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/