← Library
Madras High CourtWP/8827/2016disposed of

A.Arulraj v. The Secretary To Government,

2017-09-07Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :07.09.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.8827 of 2016 A. Arulraj .. Petitioner vs 1.The Secretary to Government, BC, MBC & Minority Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.The District BC & MBC Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

3.The District BC & MBC Welfare Officer, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

.. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction in the nature of the Writ by directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion as Tutor-cum-Warden with effect from the date of the qualification acquired by the petitioner in the light of the proposal sent by the 3rd respondent in his Na.Ka.BC1/33095/13 dated 25.09.2015 within a reasonable time. For Petitioner : Mr. M. Muthappan For Respondents : Mr.R.S. Selvam, Government Advocate

O R D E R

The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the writ petitioner for promotion to the post of Tutor-cum-Warden on the proposal submitted by the third respondent in proceedings dated 25.09.2015.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner made a submission that the writ petitioner is now working as Cook and he is qualified for promotion to the post of Tutorcum-Warden. In this regard, the writ petitioner made representations on 19.09.2013, 18.11.2013 and on 14.11.2014 respectively. The third respondent also sent a proposal to the second respondent, recommending the claim of the writ petitioner for appointment to the post of 'Tutor-cum-Warden', in spite of this, no action has been taken by the respondents.

3. Thus, without going into the merits of the case, the second respondent is directed to consider the representations submitted by the writ petitioner on 19.09.2013, 18.11.2013 and on 14.11.2014 respectively, along with the proposal sent by the third respondent in proceedings dated 25.09.2015 and pass orders, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. -s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar rpl To 1.The Secretary to Government, BC, MBC & Minority Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.The District BC & MBC Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

3.The District BC & MBC Welfare Officer, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

+1 CC to Mr. M. Muthappan Advocate Sr.No.65139 +1 CC to Government Pleader, High Court, Chennai Sr.No.65402 W.P.No.8827 of 2016 CSP(CO) KP(11.10.2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/