Mubeen @ Arshath Mubeen v. The State Rep. By, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

1. Mubeen @ Arshath Mubeen S/o. Sirajudeen, No.5, Pannaikaran Street, Seven Wells, Chennai-600001.

Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, N3-Muthialpet Police Station, Chennai.

(Crime No.175 of 2025) Respondent(s) PRAYER To release the petitioner on Anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No. 175 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, N3-Muthialpet Police Station, Chennai and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s):

Thinesh P G.D.Pon Prabhakaran T.Babitha N.Suresh Babu For Respondent(s):

Mr. S. Udayakumar Government Advocate crl. side

ORDER

This petition has been filed to release the petitioner on Anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No. 175 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, N3-Muthialpet Police Station, Chennai.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police found A1 with the possession of 200 grams of Ganja and he was arrested. Based on the confession of A1, the petitioner was arrayed as accused in crime No. 175 of 2025.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case based on the confession of A1. Further, the contraband seized from A1 is intermediate quantity. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate submits that based on the confession of A1, the petitioner has been implicated in this case and 200 grams of Ganja seized from A1. However, he raised objection to grant bail.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has been implicated in this case based on the confession of A1 and also the fact that the contraband seized from

the petitioner is intermediate quantity. Hence, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town Chennai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police daily at 06.00 p.m, until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate

action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

12-09-2025 pbl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

To

1. The XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, N3-Muthialpet Police Station, Chennai.

(Crime No.175 of 2025)

T.V.THAMILSELVI J.

CRL OP No. 22745 of 12-09-2025