← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl./594/2025closed

R.Srinivasan v. The Commissioner Of Police

2025-08-13Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR and W.M.P.No.280 of 2025 R.Srinivasan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissionerate of Avadi, Avadi, Chennai - 600 051.

2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Redhills Police District, Madhavaram Milk Farm Police Station Campus, Chennai - 600 051.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Manali Police Range, M-6, Manali Police Station Campus, Manali, Chennai - 600 068.

4. The Inspector of Police (Law and Order), M-6, Manali Police Station, Manali, Chennai - 600 058.

5. Vivek Kannan

6. Radhakrishnan

7. Jayaprakash ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or may other appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of writ, directing the third and fourth respondents 1/5

from interfering with the business activities of the petitioner in the name and style of JMJ Container Service and Yogi Enterprises at 2-A, Elanthanur Perumal Koil Street, Elanthanu, Manali Pudhunagar, Chennai - 600 103. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For R1 to R4 : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

The Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the third and the fourth respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's business carried on in the name and style of "JMJ Container Service and Yogi Enterprises".

2.

The petitioner is running a container service in the name of "JMJ Container Service and Yogi Enterprises", at the rented premises situated at 2A, Elanthanur Perumal Koil Street, Sadaiyankuppam, Elanthanu, Manali Pudhunagar, Chennai, owned by Vallalar Mutt, Tiruvottiyur. It is stated that due to some dispute among the Trustees of the said Mutt, attempts were made by the seventh respondent to evict the petitioner from the premises. Further, based on the complaint given by the seventh respondent, respondents 3 and 4 have interfered with the 2/5

petitioner's business and attempted to evict him from the said premises. Hence, the present petition has been filed.

3.

Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, submitted that a CSR has been registered on the basis of the complaint given by the seventh respondent, the landlord, alleging that the petitioner, who is the tenant in the premises, has sublet the same to the third party and has also defaulted in the payment of rent.

4.

Be that as it may, this Court is of the view that in such matters, the Police shall not interfere. The dispute between the landlord and tenant are civil in nature and it is open to the landlord to initiate appropriate proceedings before the competent forum for eviction of the tenant in accordance with law and not through the intervention of the Police.

5. In view of the above, this Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed 13.08.2025 ham 3/5

To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissionerate of Avadi, Avadi, Chennai - 600 051.

2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Redhills Police District, Madhavaram Milk Farm Police Station Campus, Chennai - 600 051.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Manali Police Range, M-6, Manali Police Station Campus, Manali, Chennai - 600 068.

4. The Inspector of Police (Law and Order), M-6, Manali Police Station, Manali, Chennai - 600 058.

5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/5

N. SATHISH KUMAR , J.

ham and W.M.P.No.280 of 2025 13.08.2025 5/5