Madras High CourtWP/9080/2016disposed of

S.Madhanraj, v. The Director,

2016-03-11Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.03.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P. No.9080 of 2016 S.Madhanraj .. Petitioner -vs1.The Director, Sugar Department, No.690, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035.

2.Chengalvarayan Co-operative Sugar Mills, rep. by its Managing Director, Periyasevalai, Ulundurpet Taluk, Villupuram District.

.. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.07.2014 as directed by the 1st respondent through his letter in Na.Ka.No.11349/Sa.Tho.2/ 2014 dated 11.08.2014 and also the reminder dated 10.03.2015 within the time frame as may be stipulated by this Court.

For petitioner : Mr.C.H.Vinobha Gandhi For respondents : Mr.S.Gunasekaran, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 16.07.2014 and 10.03.2015 for appointment to a suitable post on compassionate grounds. 2.The petitioner's father late M.R.Subramaniyan, who was working as a Messenger under the second respondent, expired on 25.08.2005, while in service. The petitioner, after completing his M.B.A (Agri-Business), has given a representation dated 16.07.2014 with all necessary documents to the second respondent, seeking suitable employment and he has also sent an identical representation on the same date to the first respondent. The first respondent, through his letter dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

11.08.2014 in Na.Ka.No.11349/Sa.Tho.2/2014, directed the second respondent to take suitable further action on the petitioner's representation.

3.Now the grievance of the petitioner is that though the first respondent has recommended his case to the second respondent, representations dated 16.07.2014 and 10.03.2015, given by the petitioner, has not been considered till date. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court. 4.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

5.Considering the fact that the petitioner's request has already been recommended by the first respondent on 11.08.2014, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 16.07.2014 and 10.03.2015 and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Director, Sugar Department, No.690, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035.

2.The Managing Director, Chengalvarayan Co-operative Sugar Mills, Periyasevalai, Ulundurpet Taluk, Villupuram District.

+1cc to Mr.c.H.Vinobha Gandhi, Advocate sr.15626 W.P. No.9080 of 2016 ksj[co] srg 22/03/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/