← Library
Madras High CourtWP/9283/2016disposed of

M.Sathishkumar, v. The Commissioner

2016-04-05Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.04.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.9283 of 2016 M. Sathishkumar .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commissioner, Chennai Corporation, Revenue Department, Ribbon Buildings, Chennai.

2. The Zonal Officer, Chennai Corporation, 5, Anderson Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai - 23.

3. The Assistant Revenue Officer, Chennai Corporation, 5, Anderson Road, Ayanaveram, Chennai - 23.

.. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation made by the petitioner on 20.01.2016 relating to make assessment of property tax in the name of the petitioner in respect of the property situated at No.41/86, Swamy Bakthan Street, Ramalingapuram, Chennai - 600 012, comprised in S.No.67/1, Purasawalkam-Perambur Taluk, Block No.37, to an extent of 1843 sq.meter, within a stipulated time to be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Ms.K.Bhuvaneswari For Respondents : Mr.T.C. Gopalakrishnan Standing Counsel

ORDER

The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation made by the petitioner on 20.01.2016 relating to make assessment of property tax in the name of the petitioner in respect of the property situated at No.41/86, Swamy Bakthan Street, Ramalingapuram, Chennai - 600 012, comprised in S.No.67/1, Purasawalkam-Perambur Taluk, Block No.37, to an extent of 1843 sq.meter, within the stipulated time. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.

Mr.T.C.Gopalakrishnan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, submitted that the respondents may be directed consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders in accordance with law within a stipulated time.

3. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2016 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

sr Sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To

1. The Commissioner, Chennai Corporation, Revenue Department, Ribbon Buildings, Chennai.

2. The Zonal Officer, Chennai Corporation, 5, Anderson Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai - 23.

3. The Assistant Revenue Officer, Chennai Corporation, 5, Anderson Road, Ayanaveram, Chennai - 23.

+ 1 cc to Mr.K.Prabhakaran, Advocate Sr 21491 + 1 cc to Mr.T.C.Gopalakrishnan, Advocate Sr 21512 KR/13/4/16 W.P.No.9283 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/