Djenova v. Union Of India Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.11.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Djenova ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Union of India represented by The Secretary to Government, (LAD), Chief Secretariat, Puducherry - 605 001.

2.The Director, Local Administration Department, Puducherry.

3.The Commissioner, Pondicherry Municipality, Pondicherry.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to release the retirement benefits of the deceased Rajam to her legal heirs or pass such further or other orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mrs.Sharada Vivek Additional Government Pleader [Puducherry]

O R D E R

When the matter was listed for hearing on 22.11.2022, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, this Court passed an order, directing the Registry to list the matter on 24.11.2022 under the caption "For Dismissal".

2. Again, when the matter was called on 24.11.2022, there was also no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In order to give one more opportunity, this Court passed an order, directing the Registry to list this matter once again under the caption "For Dismissal" on 28.11.2022.

3. Even today also i.e on 28.11.2022, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. Thus, it is evident that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition in W.P.No.22219 of 2017 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

28.11.2022 Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order To 1.The Secretary to Government, Union of India (LAD), Chief Secretariat, Puducherry - 605 001.

2.The Director, Local Administration Department, Puducherry.

3.The Commissioner, Pondicherry Municipality, Pondicherry.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Jeni 28.11.2022