S.Velumani v. R.Mohanambal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.09.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR S.Velumani ... Petitioner Vs.

1.R.Mohanambal 2.Minor Rithikasri ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to set aside the impugned order dated 18.07.2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate at Komarapalayam in MP.No.7 of 2025 in MC.No.7 of 2023.

For Petitioner : M/s.Rajeswari Nag

ORDER

Challenging the order of the Trial Court allowing the petitioner filed under Section 348 of BNSS to reopen and recall PW1 for marking of additional documents. The documents alleged to be marked is the judgment copy of the Singapore Court along with the certificate under section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. The Trial Court taking note of the nature of the documents sought to be filed has allowed the application. 1/4

2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is the judgment copy of the Singapore Court is a xerox copy is not admissible in evidence and it is not a certified copy, therefore, those documents cannot be received.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials placed on record.

4. It is to be noted that on-line copy of the judgment has been filed. Any objection to the additional documents, the same shall be made at the time of marking the documents. The relevancy and admissibility shall be decided by the Trial Court while deciding the main case itself.

5. Such view of the matter, I do not find any merits in this petition and this petition stands dismissed.

17.09.2025 dhk :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No 2/4

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate at Komarapalayam 3/4

N. SATHISH KUMAR , J.

dhk 17.09.2025 4/4