← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/16927/2017dismissed

S.Priya @ Shema Priya (F/44) v. The State Rep.By Its

2021-10-07Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.10.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Crl.O.P.No.16927 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.10407 of 2017 1.S.Priya @ Shema Priya 2.Juliet Bernard 3.Vincent Praveen Kumar .. Petitioners/Accused Vs.

1.The State rep. by its Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch Team-III, Vepery, Chennai - 600007.

(F.I.R in Cr.No.220 of 2016, dated 01.09.2016) .. Respondent/Complainant 2.Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd., Rep. by its Company Secretary & Compliance Officer Sundaram Towers, II Floor, No.6, Whites Road, Chennai-600014.

.. Second Respondent/Defaco Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records culminated in F.I.R in Crime No.220 of 2016, dated 01.09.2016, on the file of the respondent Police and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Soundar Vijay for Mr.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj For R1 : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.P.R.Raman Senior Counsel

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking interference with the investigation in F.I.R in Crime No.220 of 2016, dated 01.09.2016, on the file of the first respondent/the Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch Team-III, Vepery, Chennai.

2. The said First Information Report had been lodged pursuant to a complaint given by the second respondent, alleging offences punishable under Sections 408, 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w 34 of I.P.C and the First Information Report was registered on 01.09.2016.

3. It is also informed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the first petitioner herein had been recently taken into custody by the first respondent, with respect to the First Information Report.

4. Let the investigation go on. Let me not enter into the discussion of the facts or even give any opinion on the nature of the offences alleged by the second respondent in the complaint. Let that, purely, be the privilege of the first respondent to record the statements of witnesses, to collect documents, to conduct investigation and thereafter, file a final report in accordance with the nature of documents collected and statements recorded. A direction is given to the first respondent to proceed further with the investigation.

5. With the above said observation, the present Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar grs

To The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch Team-III, Vepery, Chennai - 600007.

2.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.16927 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.10407 of 2017 BS(CO) SB(27/10/2021)