Lenin v. State Rep By

Crl.OP.No.28083 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.28083 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner/A, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 352 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.313 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner along with other accused have abused him in filthy language and also assaulted him resulting in him sustaining injuries. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is an innocent person and due to previous enmity, a false complaint has been given against him. He would further submit that he has nothing to do with alleged offence. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate would submit that the petitioner is a habitual offender against whom there are seven previous cases of similar in nature pending against him. He would further submit that the investigation is still pending and thereby, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.28083 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

vkr 5.Taking into consideration the allegations and also the bad antecedent of the petitioner and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is essential, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 16.11.2022 vkr Crl.O.P.No.28083 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis