Kanthamma v. The Commissioner

W.M.P.Nos.37108, 37113, 37115, 37137 and 37141 of 2024 in W.P.No34262, 34264, 34268, 34279 and 34283 of 2024 W.M.P.Nos.37108, 37113, 37115, 37137 and 37141 of 2024 in W.P.Nos. 34262, 34264, 34268, 34279 and 34283 of 2024 M.SUNDAR.J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR.J.,) Captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petitions' ['WMPs' in plural and 'WMP' in singular for the sake of brevity] have been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of 'Orders of the respondent dated 28.08.2024' [hereinafter 'impugned orders' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

2. Learned counsel for writ petitioners adverting to the support affidavit submitted that original impugned orders issued by the respondent were misplaced and therefore, petitioners were not able to produce original impugned orders. Learned counsel drew the attention of this Court to relevant portion of Paragraph 14 of the support affidavit and the same reads as follows:

'14). I state that the original impugned order dated 28.08.2024 issued by the Respondent was misplaced and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

W.M.P.Nos.37108, 37113, 37115, 37137 and 37141 of 2024 in W.P.No34262, 34264, 34268, 34279 and 34283 of 2024 therefore M.SUNDAR.J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., gpa the petitioner is not able to file the original impugned order. The petitioner undertakes to produce the original impugned proceeding issued by the Respondent, Having reference No.Na.Ka.No.6365/F1/2022 order dated 28.08.2024, once the same has been traced out........'

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case on hand and taking note of the nature of the matter, aforementioned reason is accepted.

4. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMPs ordered as prayed for . [M.S.J.,] [K.R.S.J.,] 25.11.2024 (2/3) gpa W.M.P.Nos.37108, 37113, 37115, 37137 and 37141 of 2024 in W.P.Nos.34262, 34264, 34268, 34279 and 34283 of 2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2