← Library
Madras High CourtWP/31066/2022disposed of

M/S.Royal Mantra Ayurvedic v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2022-11-22Honourable Ms Justice R.N.Manjula4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.11.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA W.P.No.31066 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.30486 of 2022 M/s.Royal Mantra Ayurvedic Panchakarma Spa & Health Care, Rep. By its Proprietor R.Kamalabai D/o.Ramachandra Singh, First Floor, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District 635 001.

... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri Taluk Police Station, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District 635 001.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 or their 1/4

men, agents from interfering with the peaceful conduct of business i.e., cross massage in the name and style of "M/s.Royal Mantra Ayurvedic Panchakarma Spa & Health Care", situated at No.3/25-4, First Floor, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District 635 001. For petitioner : Mr.D.Jagadeesan For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been preferred to forbear the respondents 2 and 3 or their men, agents from interfering with the peaceful conduct of business i.e., cross massage in the name and style of "M/s.Royal Mantra Ayurvedic Panchakarma Spa & Health Care", situated at No.3/25-4, First Floor, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District 635 001.

2. The petitioner /Massage Centre has got qualified and trained therapist who are giving massage therapy to the people coming thereon. There is no immoral activities conducted in the petitioner's Centre. However, the respondent authorities frequently inspect the premises and interfere with their business. In this regard, the petitioner / Massage Centre 2/4

has given a representation dated 07.11.2022 to the respondents. However no steps have been taken on the said representation. Hence, this Writ Petition.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents would submit that the alleged representation dated 07.11.2022 will be considered in accordance with law.

4. Considering the submissions made by both sides, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 07.11.2022 and do the needful in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22.11.2022 Index:yes/No Speaking order / Non speaking order gsk 3/4

R.N.MANJULA,J.

gsk To 1.The Secretary, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri Taluk Police Station, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District 635 001.

W.P.No.31066 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.30486 of 2022

4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

22.11.2022 4/4