← Library
Madras High CourtCMP/2212/2017allowed

Perumal Mandiri v. Kannan (Since Deceased)

2022-03-03Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

CMP Nos.2212 to 2214 of 2017 in S.A.No.227 of 2015 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J ., These petitions have been filed to condone the delay, to set aside the abatement and to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased 1st respondent. 2.This Court is convinced with the reasons assigned in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions and hence, all these petitions are allowed. 3.Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment and show the legal representatives of the deceased appellant and legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent in the cause title in the Second Appeal. 4.Mr.M.Suresh, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat on behalf of the legal representatives who have been impleaded in the place of the deceased 1st respondent.

5.Respondents 2 to 4 have already been served and their names have also been printed in the cause list.

03.03.2022 ssr 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J ., ssr CMP Nos.2212 to 2214 of 2017 in S.A.No.227 of 2015 03.03.2022 (2/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis