P.Suganthi v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 04.09.2025 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy P.Suganthi
...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector Namakkal District, Namakkal.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Namakkal, Namakkal District.
3.The Thasildar O/o.The Thasildar, Senthangalam Taluk, Namakkal District.
....Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to issue a patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of Natham Survey No. 285/ 42 to an extent of 1.42 cents situated at Kanavaipatti village, Bommasamuthiram Agraharam Panchayat, senthamangalam Taluk, Namakkal district by considering the petitioners representation dated 06.10.2024 within the stipulated period fixed by this Honble court. 1/6
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Samivel For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate ***
ORDER
Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself.
2. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 3rd respondent to issue a patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of Natham Survey No. 285/ 42 to an extent of 1.42 cents situated at Kanavaipatti village, Bommasamuthiram Agraharam Panchayat, senthamangalam Taluk, Namakkal district by considering the petitioners representation dated 06.10.2024.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner constructed a house and residing in Survey No.285/42 to an 2/6
extent of 1.42 cents situated at Kanavaipatti Village, Bommasamuthiram Agraharam Panchayat and is in continous possession for 25 years. He has been paying property tax to the Government and got electricity connection for the aforesaid property. While so, he has given a representation to the respondents on 06.10.2024 requesting them to issue patta in favour of the petitioner. Since no action has been taken on the said representation, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present Writ Petition.
4. The learned Government Advocate would submit that the 3rd respondent will pass orders on the representation of the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law, within the stipulated period.
5. Heard both sides.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 06.10.2024, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner and also affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks 3/6
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken to the petitioner.
7. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Post 'For Reporting Compliance' on 10.11.2025. 04.02.2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No arr 4/6
To
1. The District Collector Namakkal District, Namakkal.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Namakkal, Namakkal District.
3.The Thasildar O/o.The Thasildar, Senthangalam Taluk, Namakkal District.
5/6
Krishnan Ramasamy,J., arr W.P.No.32807 of 2025 04.02.2025 6/6