Tvl.Monads Innovations v. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 03.10.2024 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.Nos.31839 & 31841 of 2024 Tvl.Monads Innovations, Rep., by its Partner Vittaldoss, First Floor, No.54/4, 15th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 083.
...Petitioner
Vs.
Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Ashok Nagar, Central-1, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 083.
... Respondent Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned Order dated 24.04.2024 issued by the Respondent along with its consequential Demand Order dated 24.04.2024 having Reference No ZD330424179542E issued by the Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Lavenesh Agarwal for Sanskar Samdaria For Respondent : Mr.G.Nanmaran Special Government Pleader (Taxes) 1/7
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 24.04.2024 passed by the respondent along with its consequential Demand Order dated 24.04.2024.
2. Mr.G.Nanmaran, learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes), takes notice on behalf of the respondent.
3. By consent of the parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the time of admission stage itself.
4. Alleging that there is a mismatch of tax liability filed by the petitioner for the financial year 2018-2019, the respondent passed an impugned order dated 24.04.2024, demanding the payment of differential amount in respect of the impugned assessment period.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 30.01.2024 raised on the petitioner in the GST common portal under the head "View Notice and Orders" and "View 2/7
Additional Notices and Orders" tab, as the petitioner was unaware of the said notice uploaded in the GST portal, he failed to reply the said Show Cause Notice, which led to the passing of the present impugned order. Further, he would submit that even an impugned order was uploaded in the GST portal and the physical version of such order was not served on the petitioner. The petitioner came to know about the impugned order dated 24.04.2024, only through a phone call received from the respondent for initimation of tax dues and the entire existence of a demand for tax along with interest and penalty. Hence, he sought for appropriate orders from this Court for affording an opportunity to the petitioner to present the case by way of filing a suitable reply and participate in the proceedings. It is also submitted that, if an opportunity is provided, the petitioner would be able to substantiate his case and also he agrees to make a payment of 10% of the disputed tax demand in respect of the impugned assessment period.
6. Mr.G.Nanmaran, learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes) appearing for the respondent submitted that subject to the payment of 10% of the disputed tax in respect of the impugned assessment period, this Court can remand the matter to the Authority concerned for passing appropriate orders. 3/7
7. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.
8. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and upon perusal of the materials, it is evident that the impugned show cause notice was uploaded on the GST Portal Tab. According to the petitioner, the petitioner was unaware of the issuance of the show cause notice through the GST Portal and the original of the said show cause notice was not furnished to them. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the impugned order came to be passed without affording any opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner to establish its case, thereby violating the principles of natural justice and that it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to establish their case on merits and in accordance with law.
9. For the reasons stated above, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned orders dated 24.04.2024 passed by the respondent with the 4/7
following directions:- (i) The orders impugned herein are set aside and the matter is remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration on condition that the petitioner shall pay a 10% of the disputed tax in respect of the impugned assessment period within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order; and the setting aside of the impugned order will take effect from the date of payment of the said amount. (ii) The petitioner shall file their reply/objection along with the required documents, if any, within a period of two weeks thereafter.
(iii) On filing of such reply/objection by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and issue a 14 days clear notice by fixing the date for personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible.
(iv) Considering the fact that the impugned orders itself has been set aside, this Court is of the opinion that the attachment made on the Bank account of the petitioner cannot survive any longer and hence, it is lifted. The respondent is directed to defreeze the Bank account of the petitioner immediately upon the production of a copy of this order, in case the petitioner's Bank account is attached.
5/7
10. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
03.10.2024 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No jd To The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Ashok Nagar, Central-1, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 083.
6/7
Krishnan Ramasamy,J., jd 03.10.2024 7/7