A.Kalaiselvi, v. The State Of Tamilnadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.11.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and W.M.P.Nos.12985 & 12986 of 2017 W.P.No.12186 of 2017:
A.Kalaiselvi
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Vazhapadi Panchayat Union, ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the 1/5
petitioner for selection to the post of Noon Meal Organiser under Physically Handicapped quota for the implementation of the provisions of the persons with Disabilities, Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation Act, 1995 and G.O.Ms.No.139, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department dated 28.05.2012 based on merits and selection in Pursuant to the Notification through paper Advertisement dated 29.07.2016.
W.P.No.12187 of 2017:
R.Pitchaiammal
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Pethanaickenpalayam Panchayat Union, ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the 2/5
petitioner for selection to the post of Noon Meal Organiser under Physically Handicapped quota for the implementation of the provisions of the persons with Disabilities, Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation Act, 1995 and G.O.Ms.No.139, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department dated 28.05.2012 based on merits and selection in Pursuant to the Notification through paper Advertisement dated 29.07.2016.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan [in both W.Ps] For R1 & R2 : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader [in both W.Ps] For R3 : Mr.M.Elumalai [in both W.Ps] COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the third respondent / Panchayat Union made a submission that the Recruitment Notification, which is the subject matter in the present writ petitions, had already been withdrawn. Thus, the cause did not exists as of now. 3/5
2. Therefore, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken in respect of the grounds raised in the present writ petitions.
3. Accordingly, both the writ petitions stand closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 28.11.2022 Index : Yes kak To 1.The Principal Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Vazhapadi Panchayat Union, 4.The Commissioner, Pethanaickenpalayam Panchayat Union, 4/5
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
kak 28.11.2022 5/5