T.A.Rassheetha Begum v. Thajunnisha Begum @ Thajunnisha Bivi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08-04-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR SA No. 65 of 2020 and CMP Nos.1249 of 2020 & 19736, 19737 of 2024 and

1. T.A.Rassheetha Begum W/o Late Abdul Jafar No.25/5, Kayathe Millath Nagar, Pallapatti Village, Arvadurichi Tk, Karur District.

2. S.Ajija Begum W/o K.A.Sharputneen No.126/8, Begampur, Dindigul

3. S.Mohammed Ismail, S/o Late Jubaitha Begum Residing at No. 347/65, Taj Colony, Jundtion Main Road, Meyyanoor Salem - 4.

4. S.Irshat Ahamed, S/o Late Jabaitha Begum Residing at No.347/65, Taj Colony Junction Main Road, Meyyanoor, Salem -4

5. N.Ayaeesha Banu, W/o S.Newsath Ali No.19, Buddhar St., Thiruvagoundanoor, Bodinaickenpatti Village, Salem 05

6. A.Mansoora Banu, W/o A.M.Askar Ali and D/o Thajunnisha Begum, Meerabawa St., Pallapatti Village Arvakurichi Taluk, Karur District.

7. K.M.Fathima Begum No.92/19C2, Shaw Nagar, Pallapatti, Arvaurichi Taluk, Karur District.

..Appellant(s) Vs Thajunnisha Begum @ Thajunnisha Bivi W/o V.M.K Abdul Ali, Door No.12-C, Asthat Nagar, Suramangalam, Salem - 5.

..Respondent(s) Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC to allow the Second Appeal by setting aside the Judgment and Decree dated 08-08-2019, made in A.S.21/2018 on the file of the II- Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem, confirming the Judgement and Decree dated 30.01.2018 made in O.S.No.82/2016, on the file of the I -Additional District Munsif, Salem.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : M/s.M.J.Jaseem Mohamed JUDGEMENT When the second appeal came up for hearing on 07.04.2026, the learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo, withdrawing his appearance in the second appeal, as he could not get instruction from the appellants.

2. After recording the memo, this court directed the Registry to remove the names of the learned counsel for the appellants from the cause list by printing the names of the appellants and list the matter under the caption " for dismissal " on 08.04.2026.

3. Today, the second appeal is listed under the caption " for dismissal " by printing the names of the appellants in the cause list. However, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, which shows that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the second appeal. The learned counsel for the respondents is present.

4. In view of the above, this second appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 08.04.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/ Non Speaking order MST To

1. The II Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem.

2. The I -Additional District Munsif, Salem.

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

MST 08.04.2026