← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/23024/2025dismissed

Sundar v. State Rep By Inspector Of Police

2025-08-20Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.08.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P. No.23024 of 2025 Sundar ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, South Zone St Thomas Mount, Chennai District.

(Crime No.Not Known of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in the event of his arrest by the respondent police concerned in Crime No. Not Known of 2025 on the file of the respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent : Mr. S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ********

O R D E R

This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner in connection with Crime No.Not Known of 2025 registered by the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 318(1) and 351(3) of BNS. 1/4

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that, based on the complaint given by one Muthumari on 24.06.2025, a case has been registered against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 79, 351(4) BNS and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act.

3. On perusal of the F.I.R., it indicates that the petitioner had contacted the de-facto complainant over phone and through Facebook, and informed her that obscene photos of the de-facto complainant had been uploaded on Facebook.

4. The petitioner, claiming innocence, has sought anticipatory bail alleging that, after borrowing the money from him, the de-facto complainant, in order to evade repayment, has given a false complaint.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that, based on the complaint, a preliminary enquiry was conducted, and the WhatsApp and Facebook communications discloses a prima facie case against this petitioner.

6. This Court has also perused the Facebook conversations and finds that the custody of the petitioner is required.

7. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 20.08.2025 nvi 2/4

To

1. The XI Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, South Zone St Thomas Mount, Chennai District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

3/4

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J., nvi Crl.O.P. No.23024 of 2025 20.08.2025 4/4