D.Udhaya Kumar v. V.Ravi Narayanan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.11.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WMP No. 37517 of 2025 in WP No. 10585 OF 2023 D.Udhaya Kumar Petitioner(s) Vs V.Ravi Narayanan M 37/2b, 7th Cross Street, Besant Nagar, Chennai-600 090 and 14 Others Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s):

Mr.K.V.Sajeevkumar For Respondent(s):

Mr.K.S.V.Prasad For R1 To R4.

Mr.A.Edwin Prabakar, State Government Pleader For R5. Mr.D.Veerasekaran, Standing Counsel For TNHB For R6. Mr.M.Suresh Kumar, Additional Advocate General Assisted By Mr.N.R.Ramesh Kanna, Standing Counsel For Greater Chennai Corporation For R7 And R8.

Mr.R.Sivakumar, Standing Counsel For Cmda For R9. Mr.S.Rajasekar For R10 And R11.

Mr.M.Kempraj For R12.

R13 And R15 - No Appearance.

Mr.K.V.Babu For R14.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The application seeking impleadment has been filed by the proposed applicant on the submission that he has now purchased the property in dispute and has, therefore, a proprietary interest and any order passed in the case may adversely affect his proprietary rights.

2. Upon due consideration, the application is allowed as prayed for.

3. Registry to carry out necessary amendments in the petition.

4. Copy of the petition along with annexure be supplied to newly added respondent. Three weeks time is granted to file reply. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 18.11.2025 TAR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis