← Library
Madras High CourtWP/30544/2022closed

Chennai Airport Contract Workers Union v. Government Of India

2025-07-14Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and W.M.P. No.29974 of 2022 Chennai Airport Contract Workers Union represented by its Secretary Regn. No.61/KPM, No.72A, M.G.R. Street, Karunanidhi Nagar, Ullagaram, Chennai - 600 091.

..

Petitioner vs.

1. Government of India, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Shram Mantralaya, New Delhi - 110 001.

2. Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Office of the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), No.4, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhaan, Chennai - 600 006.

3. Airports Authority of India, represented by its Airport Director, Chennai Airport, Meenambakkam, Chennai - 600 027.

4. M/s. Omega Enterprises, Room No.106, Building-5, Ganeshwadi CHS, Opp. Akruti Towers, 1/4

Bhim Nagar MIDC, Andheri (E), Mumbai - 400 093.

..

Respondents PRAYER: The Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 3 and 4 to continue the service of the 123 members of the petitioner Union for the work of collecting parking fees and lane management at Chennai Airport by providing suitable clause in the notice inviting tender dated nil.11.2022 to continue to engage the 123 members of the petitioner union as provided in the previous tender notification till the industrial dispute raised by them for regularization is decided by the competent industrial adjudicator pursuant to the dispute raised by the petitioner union on 20.06.2022 before the 2nd respondent.

For Petitioner :

Mr.Balan Haridas For Respondent :

Mr.A.R. Sakthivel, Special Central Government Standing Counsel [for R1 & R2] Mr. Ramaswamy Meyyappan [for R3] Mr. C. Kasirajan [for R4]

ORDER

Both sides' counsels present and represented that a fresh contract was awarded and the employees in the petitioner Union were replaced as fresh 2/4

contract employees. Therefore, the prayer in this petition becomes 'infructuous'. The petitioner Union is at liberty to approach the Labour Court for appropriate remedy..

2. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the Writ petition is closed. There shall no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 14.07.2025 [3/3] Index : Yes/No.

Speaking order/non-speaking order mjs To

1. Government of India, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Shram Mantralaya, New Delhi - 110 001.

P. DHANABAL, J., mjs

2. Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Office of the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), No.4, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhaan, Chennai - 600 006.

3/4

3. Airports Authority of India, represented by its Airport Director, Chennai Airport, Meenambakkam, Chennai - 600 027.

14.07.2025 [3/3] 4/4