G.Velu v. The Superintendent Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.11.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.No.30212 of 2019 G.Velu

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Deevattipatti Police Station, Salem District.

...Respondents

PRAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent 1 and 2 to not to include the petitioner name in the history sheet in pertain to maintain the case records on the file of the 3rd respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Girishbabu For Respondents : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The prayer sought for in the present writ petition cannot be maintained since opening of a history sheet is based on various factors and this Court will not be justified in granting a blanket order to refrain the respondents from opening a history sheet against the petitioner herein.

2.Nevertheless, if the petitioner is aggrieved against opening of a history sheet in future against him, it is always open to him to challenge the same in manner known to law. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.With these observations, this writ petition stands closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Deevattipatti Police Station, Salem District.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

+1 cc to M/s.Girishbabu,Advocate Sr.No. 94285 AKM/20.12.19/2P- 6C / W.P.No.30212 of 2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/