N.Gopikrishnan v. The Commissione Rof Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.14384 of 2004 N.Gopikrishnan ... Petitioner vs.

1.

The Commissioner of Police, Madras - 8.

2.

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, City Crime Branch, Egmore, Madras - 8.

3.

K.S.Venugopal ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to enquire, investigate and proceed in accordance with law, on the complaint dated 02.04.2004 sent against the 3rd respondent to return and refund the various deposits collected from the petitioner and his family members. For Petitioner :

No appearance For Respondents 1 & 2 :

Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Advocate For 3rd Respondent :

M/s.Anand Venkatesh

O R D E R

When this matter was taken up for hearing on 04.07.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter 'for dismissal' after one week.

2.

Even today, there is no representation for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petitioner either in person or through counsel. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, W.P.M.P.No.18127 of 2004 is closed.

aeb Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar aeb To:

1.

The Commissioner of Police, Madras - 8.

2.

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, City Crime Branch, Egmore, Madras - 8.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.48793 W.P.No.14384 of 2004 MV(CO) CS/25/07/17 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/