← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/3021/2017dismissed as infructuous

M. Rajasekar v. P. Elango

2024-11-27Honourable Mr Justice V. Lakshminarayanan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.11.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and C.M.P.Nos.14211 & 14212 of 2017 In CRP.No.3021 of 2017 M.Rajasekar .. Petitioner

Versus

1.P.Elango 2.S.Saroja 3.S.Selvam 4.S.Harikrishnan 5.Minor S.Manikandan Rep. by Mother & Natural Guardian S.Saroja 6.M.A.Moorthy .. Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the petition and order passed in I.A.No.10529 of 2017 in O.S.No.4172 of 2017 dated 10.08.2017 on the file of the XVII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.Abishek for Mr.B.Vijay For Respondents : No appearance 1/5

In CRP.Nos.3028 & 3029 of 2017 1.S.Saroja 2.S.Selvam 3.S.Harikrishnan 4.Minor S.Manikandan Rep. by Mother & Natural Guardian S.Saroja .. Petitioners in both CRPs.

Versus

1.P.Elango 2.M.Rajasekar 3.M.A.Moorthy .. Respondents in both CRPs.

PRAYER in CRP.No.3028 of 2017: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the petition and order in I.A.No.10512 of 2017 in O.S.SR45309 of 2017 dated 08.08.2017 on the file of the XVII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. PRAYER in CRP.No.3029 of 2017: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the petition and order in I.A.No.10529 of 2017 in O.S.No.4172 of 2017 dated 10.08.2017 on the file of the XVII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioners in both revisions : Mr.V.Selvaperumal For Respondents in both revisions: No appearance COMMON ORDER 2/5

I heard Mr.Abishek for Mr.B.Vijay and Mr.V.Selvaperumal for the civil revision petitioners.

2. Both counsels state that the suit in O.S.No.4172 of 2017 was dismissed for default on 02.09.2022. Mr.V.Selvaperumal further adds that the suit property itself has been acquired by the Government for the purpose of laying metro rail.

3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated. All the three civil revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 27.11.2024 nl Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order To The XVII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. 3/5

4/5

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

nl 27.11.2024 5/5