R.Marudhamani v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.10.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA in Crl.A.No.1131 of 2023 R.Marudhamani ... Petitioner/Appellant Vs.

The State represented by, The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City - I, R.A.Puram, Chennai.

(V & AC Cr. No.3/2012/AC/CC-IV) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C., pleased to suspend the sentence of imprisonment passed vide judgment dated 19.09.2023, in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, on the file of the learned Special Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.T.K.S.Gandhi For Respondent : Mr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/6

O R D E R

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner/appellant, seeking suspension of sentence, imposed by the learned Special Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu, vide judgment in Spl.S.C.No.8 of 2013 dated 19.09.2023.

2. The conviction and sentence imposed against the petitioner/appellant is as follows:- Under Section Sentence 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, three years of simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo six months simple imprisonment.

13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 three years of simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo six months simple imprisonment.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant, there are arguable points available in the Criminal Appeal, which is not likely to be taken for final hearing in the near future and the petitioner/appellant has got a fair chance of succeeding in the Criminal Appeal and hence, the sentence imposed against the petitioner/appellant may be suspended and the 2/6

petitioner/appellant may be enlarged with bail. He further submitted that the trial Court, while convicting the petitioner, has suspended the sentence till 20.10.2023.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the prosecution has proved the case beyond reasonable doubts and the trial Court on finding the petitioner/appellant guilty, convicted him as stated above. Therefore, he vehemently opposed for grant of suspension of sentence.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant and Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant, this Court is of the view that the sentence of imprisonment can be suspended on certain conditions. Accordingly, till the disposal of the Criminal Appeal, suspension of sentence is granted, on the 3/6

following conditions :- i. The petitioner/appellant shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu;

ii. The petitioner/appellant shall appear before the trial Court on the first working day of every English Calendar month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered. 16.10.2023 ham Note : Issue order copy on 17.10.2023.

4/6

To

1. The Special Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City - I, R.A.Puram, Chennai.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

ham in Crl.A.No.1131 of 2023 16.10.2023 2/2 6/6