C. Angamuthu v. The State Of Tamilnadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.Nos.27910, 27911 & 27912 of 2006 & Connected M.Ps.
W.P.No.27910 of 2006:
1.C.Angamuthu 2.P.Rajamani 3.S.Murugesan 4.P.S.Amarnath 5.C.Vijayakumar 6.S.S.Velu ... Petitioners W.P.No.27911 of 2006:
1. K.M.Senthilkumar
2. M.Senthilkumar
3. N.Jayaraman
4. I.Raja ... Petitioners W.P.No.27912 of 2006:
1. P.Mohankumar
2. P.Krishnamoorthy 3.P.Kannan ... Petitioners Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.
2.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation rep. by its General Manager, (Salem Zone) Salem.
...Respondents in
all the W.Ps.
Prayer in W.P.No.27910 of 2006: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in relation to the proceedings in No.E1/31753/TNSTC(Salem)/2006, dated 24.07.2006 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to consider the petitioners for the post of driver in the Salem and Region for the existing vacancies available with the second respondent. Prayer in W.P.No.27911 of 2006: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in relation to the proceedings in No.E1/31755/TNSTC(Salem)/2006, dated 24.07.
2006 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to consider the petitioners for the post of driver in the Namkkal Region for the existing vacancies available with the second respondent. Prayer in W.P.No.27912 of 2006: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in relation to the proceedings in No.E1/31756/TNSTC(Salem)/2006, dated 24.07.2006 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to consider the petitioners for the post of Conductor in the Namkkal Region for the existing vacancies available with the second respondent. For Petitioner in all the W.Ps.
: Mr.T.S.Baskaran For Respondent-1 in all the W.Ps.
: Mr.K.Ravikumar, AGP For Respondent-2 in all the W.Ps.
: Mr.S.Rajeni Ramadass COMMON ORDER Since the issue involved in these writ petitions are one and the same all the three writ petitions were taken up
together and common order is being passed in these writ petitions.
2. When the matters were taken up for hearing, M/S.S.Rajeni Ramadass, learned Stating counsel appearing for the Transport Corporation submitted that the petitioners in all the three writ petition were duly appointed by the second respondent department subsequent to the filing of the writ petitions. He has also produced the letter issued by the second respondent showing the date of appointment of the petitioners in all the writ petitions.
3.In view of the above, since nothing survives for further adjudication in these writ petitions, these writ petitions are closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar smi To, 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.
+3cc to M/S.Rajeni Ramadass, Advocate, S.R.No.37676 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.37962 W.P.Nos.27910, 27911 & 27912 of 2006 GSP(11/07/2018)