Ramachandran v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.11.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Ramachandran ... Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Salem District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Valapady Police Station, Salem District - 636 115.

3.The Revenue Tahsildar, O/o. Taluk Office, Valapady Taluk, Salem District - 636 115.

4.The Village Administrative Officer, Athanurpatti, Valapady Taluk, Salem District - 636 115.

5.Kokila 6.Ananthi 7.Muniyappan ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family in the name of enquiry pending suit in O.S.No.27 of Pg.Nos.1/4

2024 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Valapady, Salem District and consequently forbearing the third and fourth respondents from dispossessing the petitioner from the property admeasuring about 0.1 cents situated in between the patta lands of the petitioner comprised of 46/2 and 8/2A situated at Kumarasamiyur Village, Valapady Taluk, Salem District, except undue due process of law.

For Petitioner :

Mr.G.Pugazhenthi For Respondents :

Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 and R2 Mr.K.M.D.Muhillan Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R3 and R4 Mr.F.Wellington for R5 to R7

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family in the name of enquiry pending suit in O.S.No.27 of 2024 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Valapady, Salem District and consequently forbear the third and fourth respondents from dispossessing the petitioner from the property admeasuring about 0.1 cents situated in between the patta lands of the petitioner comprised of 46/2 and 8/2A situated at Kumarasamiyur Village, Valapady Taluk, Salem District, except undue due process of law. Pg.Nos.2/4

2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, would submit that the complaint filed by the petitioner has already been closed, as the matter pertains to a civil nature.

3. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 12.11.2024 Index: Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No r n s Pg.Nos.3/4

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

r n s To 1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Salem District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Valapady Police Station, Salem District - 636 115.

3.The Revenue Tahsildar, O/o. Taluk Office, Valapady Taluk, Salem District - 636 115.

4.The Village Administrative Officer, Athanurpatti, Valapady Taluk, Salem District - 636 115.

12.11.2024 Pg.Nos.4/4