← Library
Madras High CourtWP/33016/2024disposed of

Dr.M.Mohamad Yunus v. The Block Development Officer

2024-11-11Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar7 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.11.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Dr.M.Mohamad Yunus S/o.Mohammed Sab ... Petitioner vs

1. The Block Development Officer Krishnagiri Panchayat Union Krishnagiri Taluk & District

2. The Panchayat President Devasamudram Panchayat Krishnagiri Taluk & District

3. The Panchayat Secretary Devasamudram Panchayat Krishnagiri Taluk & District

4. Krishnamoorthy S/o.Ganesan ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 herein to take action against the fourth respondent for unapproved drainage Page Nos.1/7

construction and staircase of the home entrance made by encroaching the common pathway of the property situated at MM Colony in Survey No.21/1, Devasamuthiram Village, Krishnagiri Taluk & District thereby causing trouble to the petitioner herein to enjoy ingress and egress of his property situated in MM Colony in Survey No.21/1, Devasamuthiram Village, Krishnagiri Taluk & District morefully in Plot No.22, 23 on the basis of the Field Inspection Report dated 22.07.2024 submitted by the third respondent.

For Petitioner :

Mr.G.Magesh Kumar For Respondents :

Mr.M.Shahjahan Special Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity].

2. Mr.G.Magesh Kumar, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner and Mr.M.Shahjahan, learned Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 are before us.

Page Nos.2/7

3. Adverting to representation from the writ petitioner dated 04.07.2024, learned counsel for writ petitioner submitted that there is alleged encroachment at 'MM Colony in Survey No.21/1, Devasamuthiram Village, Krishnagiri Taluk & District' [hereinafter 'said land' for the sake of convenience and clarity] by R4 before us. To be noted, R4 is a private respondent.

4. In the light of what has been alluded to supra and considering the limited scope of the captioned WP, with the consent of both sides, main WP was taken up.

5. It was submitted by learned Special Government Pleader that G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022 has been put in place, wherein and whereby Divisional Monitoring committee, District Monitoring Committee and State Steering Committee have been constituted inter alia for a single point reporting / monitoring system qua Government lands. Page Nos.3/7

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, we deem it appropriate to refer the matter to the Divisional Monitoring Committee headed by Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Krishnagiri District, in the light of G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022.

7. This Court directs the jurisdictional Divisional Monitoring Committee to examine if there is encroachment qua said land. The Divisional Monitoring Committee shall also ensure that adequate and ample opportunity is given to persons concerned more particularly alleged encroacher (R4) before taking a call. In this regard, we are acutely conscious that there is no representation for the alleged encroacher viz., R4 either in the physical Court or on VC (video conferencing) platform (to be noted, this is a hybrid hearing which is a regular/routine/daily feature in this Court) and therefore, this safety valve is put in place. To be noted, all the rights and contentions of alleged encroacher are preserved for being raised before the Committee concerned which shall consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law untrammelled by this proceedings in this Court.

Page Nos.4/7

8. The Divisional Monitoring Committee qua G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022, shall (if it comes to the conclusion that there is encroachment) report the encroachment for further action (for removal of encroachment which again shall be after giving adequate and ample opportunity to alleged encroacher).

9. It is open to the WP petitioner and or anyone concerned with this matter to come to this Court on the same issue even with a similar / same prayer if there are any change of circumstances.

10. We make it clear that we have not expressed any view or opinion as to whether there is encroachment or not qua said land as it turns on facts and it is for the Divisional Monitoring Committee to take a call on this aspect of the matter. We also make it clear that this exercise will not apply to patta land and it will apply only to public land, if there is any encroachment in public land.

Page Nos.5/7

11. Captioned WP is disposed of with the aforementioned observations and directives in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs.

(M.S.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 11.11.2024 Index : Yes / No gpa To 1.The District Collector, Tirupattur District, Tirupattur - 635 601.

2. The Panchayat President Devasamudram Panchayat Krishnagiri Taluk & District

3. The Panchayat Secretary Devasamudram Panchayat Krishnagiri Taluk & District

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer Krishnagiri District Page Nos.6/7

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., gpa 11.11.2024 Page Nos.7/7