← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP/16409/2025dismissed

S.Ilayaraja v. State Rep. By, Inspector Of Police,

2025-08-29Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN in Crl.A.No.1374 of 2025 S.Ilayaraja

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State Rep By The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Tiruppur South.

Crime No.01/2022 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C., to suspend the sentence imposed in the judgment dated 08.04.2025 in Spl.S.C.No.47 of 2022 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (FTMC), Tiruppur under POCSO Act and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above criminal appeal.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Conscioius Ilango For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (FTMC), Tiruppur, in Spl.S.C.No.47 of 2022 dated 08.04.2025, and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above appeal.

2.

The petitioner, who is an accused in Spl.S.C.No.47 of 2022, was convicted and sentenced by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (FTMC), Tiruppur, vide judgment dated 08.04.2025, as follows:

Rank of the accused Conviction under Section Sentence awarded A1 5(l) read with 6 of POCSO Act, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.

506(i) of IPC to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent. 4.

This Court finds no reasons to suspend the sentence since the Trial Court has gone through the evidence in its entirety and also finds that the petitioner had committed very serious and heinous offence as against the victim girl.

5.

In the result, the petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed.

29.08.2025 (2/2) Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order sma

To 1.The Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (FTMC), Tiruppur. 2.The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Tiruppur South.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

sma 29.08.2025 (2/2)