Madras High CourtCRP/31/2017dismissed for nonprosecution

R. Nagaraj v. Smt. Siluvaimani

2020-07-21Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.07.2020

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Civil Revision Petition (NPD) Nos.31 & 32 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.11 of 2017 ---- R.Nagaraj ..Petitioner in both CRPs Vs Smt.Siluvaimani .....respondent in both CRPs.

Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, (i) against the fair and decreetal order dated 08.11.2016 made in RCA No.21 of 2012 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority / II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore, confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 18.10.2011 made in RCOP No.241 of 1995 on the file of the Rent Controller / III Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore (Prayer in CRP No.31 of 2017).

(ii) to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 08.11.2016 made in I.A.No.208 of 2015 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority / II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore, in RCA No.21 of 2012 on the file 1/4

of the Rent Control Appellate Authority / II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 18.10.2011 in RCOP No.241 of 1995 on the file of the Rent Controller / III Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore (Prayer in CRP No.32 of 2017). For Petitioner (in both CRPs) : Mr.No Appearance For Respondent (in both CRPs) : Mr.Mukunth for Mr.T.L.Thirumalaisamy

ORDER

Despite several opportunities have been given, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 14.07.2020, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 21.07.2020 under the caption ''for dismissal''. Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.

2. On an earlier occasion, the petitioner was directed to pay 50% of the total arrears of rental amount to the respondent/ landlord within a period of eight weeks. During the pendency of the appeal, he has not paid the arrears of rent. Therefore, a petition under Section 11(4) of the Act was filed. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, both the 2/4

Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 21.07.2020 dn To

1. The Rent Controller / III Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore

2. Rent Control Appellate Authority / II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore

3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras 3/4

P.VELMURUGAN,J.

dn Civil Revision Petition (NPD) Nos.31 & 32 of 21.07.2020 4/4