← Library
Madras High CourtWP/29852/2024disposed of

M/S Vikash Steels v. The Assistant Commissioner (St) (Fac)

2024-10-04Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 04.10.2024 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.Nos.32547 & 32548 of 2024 M/s.Vikash Steels, Represented by its Proprietor, Mr.Harishkumar, No.770, T.H.Road, Tollgate, Chennai-600 008.

...Petitioner

Vs.

The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC), Tondiarpet Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Tax Office, Chennai-600 003.

... Respondent Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the Respondent and to quash the impugned order dated 31.05.2024 bearing No.33AAAPH4177K1ZS/2017-18 to 2021-22.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ashish For Respondent : Mr.G.Nanmaran, Special Government Pleader (Taxes) 1/6

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 31.05.2024 passed by the respondent.

2. Mr.G.Nanmaran, learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes) takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, a Show Cause Notice dated 10.01.2024 raised on the petitioner in the GST common portal under the head "Additional Notices Tab", as the petitioner was unaware of the same, he failed to respond the said Show Cause Notice. Further, he submitted that even an impugned order was uploaded in the GST portal and the physical version of such order was not served on the petitioner. It is also submitted that, if an opportunity is provided, the petitioner would be able to substantiate his case and also he agrees to make a payment of 10% of the disputed tax in respect of the impugned assessment period.

2/6

5. Mr.G.Nanmaran, learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes) would submit that subject to the deposit of 10% of the disputed tax in respect of the impugned assessment period, this Court may remand the matter to the authority concerned for passing appropriate orders.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

7. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and upon perusal of the materials, it is evident that the impugned show cause notice was uploaded on the GST Portal Tab. According to the petitioner, the petitioner was not aware of the issuance of the show cause notice issued through the GST Portal and the original of the said show cause notice was not furnished to them. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the impugned order came to be passed without affording any opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner to establish its case, thereby violating the principles of natural justice and that it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to establish their case on merits and in accordance 3/6

with law.

8. For the reasons stated above, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned order dated 31.05.2024 passed by the respondent. Accordingly, this Court passes the following order:- (i) The order impugned herein is set aside and the matter is remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration on condition that the petitioner shall pay a 10% of the disputed tax to the respondent within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order; and the setting aside of the impugned order will take effect from the date of payment of the said amount.

(ii) The petitioner shall file their reply/objection along with the required documents, if any, within a period of two weeks thereafter.

(iii) On filing of such reply/objection by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and issue a 14 days clear notice by fixing the date for personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible.

9. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 4/6

04.10.2024 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No jd To The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC), Tondiarpet Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Tax Office, Chennai-600 003.

5/6

Krishnan Ramasamy,J., jd 04.10.2024 6/6