D.Vadivel v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.10.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN D.Vadivel ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Denkanikottai Circle, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Anchetty Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

4. The Tahsildar, Anchetty Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

5. The Village Administrative Officer, Anchetty Village, Anchetty Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

6. Shetty @ Ramasamy ...

Respondents 1/4

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner for laying stones in petitioner agricultural field situated at Survey No.694/3A1B as per patta No.3570, the patta for 13.92 acres of land within Anchetty Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri Distrct based on the petitioner's complaint dated 30.05.2023.

For Petitioner : Mr. R.Balagurusamy For R1 to R5 : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

Petitioner seeks police protection for enjoyment of land comprised in Survey No.694/3A1B as per patta No.3570, the patta for 13.92 acres of land situated at Anchetty Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri Distrct.

2. Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that, on the complaint given by the petitioner, parties were called and enquired. Petitioner claims right over the property based on the purchase deed dated 20.01.2016 executed by Murugesn, Pachiappan and Madhu. Police asked the private respondent to produce the documents. For which, he has sought some time and yet to produce the documents. 2/4

Parties were advised not to indulge in any act of violence, but to settle the dispute before the appropriate Court. In the said circumstances, petitioner has come before this Court seeking direction for police protection for laying stones in the disputed land.

3. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, petitioner claims that, there is no dispute regarding title and no civil suit is pending against him regarding the title also the revenue records are mutated in his name as per the sale deed.

4. In the light of the above facts which is seen from the records, the respondent police shall take note of the complaint if any regarding criminal act in connection with the property and act in accordance with law.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 18.10.2023 Index : Yes/No Sma Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

sma 3/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Denkanikottai Circle, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Anchetty Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

4. The Tahsildar, Anchetty Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

5. The Village Administrative Officer, Anchetty Village, Anchetty Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

18.10.2023 4/4