Pushpa v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

CRL.O.P.No.28759 of 2022 CRL.O.P.No.28759 of 2022 T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 294(b), 307 @ 306 IPC in Cr.No.325 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the defacto complainant and the first petitioner regarding kandu vatti complaint given by the first petitioner as against the deceased/defacto complainant. Whereby, the quarrel got worse and the petitioners and other accused poured the kerosene on the defacto complainant and set fire on her. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence prays for grant of anticipatory bail.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL.O.P.No.28759 of 2022 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

anu 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that there arose a wordy quarrel between the first petitioner and the defacto complainant, whereby petitioners and other accused poured the kerosene on the defacto complainant and set fire on her. He would further submit that the suicidal note has also been submitted before this Court, which reveals that the petitioners have jointly committed the alleged crime. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the gravity of offence committed by the petitioners and the dying declaration of the deceased, this case requires a detailed investigation and this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 08.12.2022 anu CRL.O.P.No.28759 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis