G.V.Suresh v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL.O.P.No.28911 of 2022 CRL.O.P.No.28911 of 2022 T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 409, 464, 465, 468, 477A and 420 of IPC in Cr.No.700 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant, who is the Risk Manager at Equitas Financial Bank, Thiruvottiyur Branch, Chennai had lodged a complaint stating that the petitioner/A2 along with other accused had failed to repay the debt amount which was recovered from the bank customers. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL.O.P.No.28911 of 2022 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

jai 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that in this case, the investigation is pending and if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail at this stage, there is a possibility of abscondence and will hamper the investigation. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition seeking anticipatory bail is dismissed. 13.12.2022 jai CRL.O.P.No.28911 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis