Sri Vetri Constructions v. The Superintending Engineer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21-08-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
1. Sri Vetri Constructions Rep By Partner, V Nireshkuamr, No.33 SR Complex, Siddha Veerapa Street, Dharmapuri District.
Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Superintending Engineer Pwd Buildings (C And M) Circle, Salem 2.The Executive Engineer PWD Building (C And M) Circle, Krsihnagiri Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 2 nd respondent to accept the petitioners E Tender application dated 17.08.2025 submitted the E Tender notice No. 21/2025 26/SE/ B (C and M) /SLM dated 15.07.2025 issued by the 1st respondent with respect to Serial no. 17 of the notification, i.e., for the Construction of 10 class rooms
in Muthamizh Government Higher secondary School under NABARD RIDF XXXI for the year 2025-26 at Arasampatti in Krishnagiri District, without insisting on site visit certificate.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.V.Sakkarapani For Respondent:
Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the 2 nd respondent to accept the e-tender application of the petitioner dated 17.08.2025 submitted pursuant to the e-tender notice dated 15.07.2025.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of several requests made by the petitioner for site inspection certificate, the same is not given to the petitioner. As a result, the application submitted by the petitioner was not received. Under these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking for a direction to the respondent to receive the application of the petitioner.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents produced the written instructions from the 1 st respondent. It is seen that the application has already been received and it has been opened on 18.08.2025. Presently, the tender is under scrutiny before the 1 st respondent.
4. In the considered view of this Court, if the petitioner was not issued with the site inspection certificate, the petitioner should have come before this Court and sought for necessary direction. Now that the petitioner did not have the site inspection certificate, the petitioner could not have submitted the application and the application which have already been submitted has been opened on 18.08.2025 and it is under scrutiny by the 1 st respondent.
5. In view of the same, the relief as sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted in this present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.
21-08-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes
To 1.The Superintending Engineer Pwd Buildings C And M Circle, Salem 2.Teh Executive Engineer Pwd Building C And M Circle, Krsihnagiri
N.ANAND VENKATESH J.
gd 21-08-2025