G.Karthikeyan v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD G.Karthikeyan

...Petitioner

-Vs1.The Commissioner, Transport Department, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Sankari - 637 301.

3.Senthil Kumar, Proprietor of V.V.S.Transport, Union Road, Koundampalayam, Coimbatore - 641 030.

4.Parthiban

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.06.2019 and take necessary action on merits within a time frame fixed by this Court and pass such further orders. 1/4

For Petitioner :

M/s.M.Rajalakshmi for Mr.K.C.Karl Marx For R1 & R2 :

Mrs.R.L.Karthika, Government Advocate

O R D E R

Today, 03.04.2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition, and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

2. In view of the submission coupled with the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

03.04.2025 cda Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order 2/4

To 1.The Commissioner, Transport Department, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Sankari - 637 301.

3/4

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

cda 03.04.2025 4/4