Viji v. The State Rep By Its,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.10.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Viji
...Petitioner/Accused
Vs.
State rep by The Inspector of Police, Sathiyamangalam Police Station Villupuram District (Crime No.181 of 2024)
...Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No. 181 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.
*** For Petitioner : M/s. M.Revathi For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinothkumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6
O R D E R
The petitioner, who was arrested on 13.08.2024 and remanded to judicial custody on the same day for the offences under Sections 133, 140(2), 310(2), 311, 351(3) of BNS Act and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, 1992, in Crime No. 181 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the first accused contacted the defacto complainant and stated that he can give gold 7% less than the market value. Thereafter, the defacto complainant and his friends picked up the first accused in their car and at that time, one car which came behind their car overtacked them suddenly and stopped in front of their car, in which 11 persons came and attacked with iron rod and caused damage to the car mirror and robbed a sum of Rs.7,60,000/-. Hence, the case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the 2/6
prosecution, and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he is a law-abiding citizen and he is ready to furnish substantial sureties for his due release on bail; therefore, he prays for the grant of bail to the petitioner.
4.Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent police opposed granting bail to the petitioner by stating that the petitioner along with other accused had robbed a sum of Rs.7,60,000/- to the defacto complainant. He would further submit that co-accused have already been granted bail and there is one previous case pending against the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the submissions made on both sides, considering the nature of offences and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner from 13.08.2024 and though the petitioner is having one previous case, in that case, he was granted bail, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain 3/6
conditions:
[a]. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the court of Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;
[c] The petitioner shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond;
[d] The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected;
[e] The petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[f] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to 4/6
any police officer or tamper with evidence;
[g] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and [h] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of the BNS.
28.10.2024 vsg P.DHANABAL, J.
vsg To 1.Judicial Magistrate Court, Gingee.
2.Central Prison, Cuddalore.
5/6
3.The Inspector of Police, Sathiyamangalam Police Station Villupuram District.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
28.10.2024 6/6