← Library
Madras High CourtWP/12908/2017closed

M.Manoharan, Superintendent v. The Secretary To

2020-09-17Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.12908 of 2017 & W.M.P.Nos.13775, 13776, 22211/17 & 6959/19 M.Manoharan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, 2.The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3.The District Collector, Nagappattinam District, Nagappattinam.

4.Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Chief Secretary, 5.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Chennai - 3.

6.The Secretary, Personal and Administrative Reforms Department, 7.K.Vijaya, Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, NH-45 Naganathar Sannathi St., Nagapattinam.

... Respondents

Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari and call for the records from the 1st respondent and quash the G.O.No.2(d) 153 Revenue (Service-I) for the year 2016 - 2017 dated 12.05.2017 by the 4th respondent.

For Petitioner : M/s.D.Malarvizhi For Respondents : Mr.P.Chinnadurai for R1 to R4 & R6 Additional Government Pleader Mr.Karthik Rajan for R5

O R D E R

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorari and to call for the records from the first respondent and to quash the G.O.No.2(d) 153 Revenue (Service-I) for the year 2016 - 2017 dated 12.05.2017 by the fourth respondent.

2.This petition is today heard through Video Conferencing. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner who was present along with her, placed her submissions before this Court.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner was not given promotion and he was imposed with the punishment of stoppage of increment. Challenging the said punishment, the petitioner preferred appeal before the Appellate Authority. Hence, liberty may be given to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law after disposal of the appeal. 4.In view of the above, this writ petition is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy in the manner known to law after disposal of the appeal preferred before the Appellate Authority. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS ) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department,

2.The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3.The District Collector, Nagappattinam District, Nagappattinam.

4.The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, 5.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Chennai - 3.

6.The Secretary, Personal and Administrative Reforms Department, +1 cc to Government Pleader,sr.30518.

Pvs(co) krd 3/11 W.P.No.12908 of 2017